U.S. attempt to limit Wall Street bonuses fizzles out quietly
The regulatory agenda released by the Trump administration on Thursday contained a signal that the U.S. government has halted its work on restricting Wall Street executives’ bonuses and other pay incentives.
The 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law called for federal banking and securities regulators to create limits on incentive-based compensation at big financial companies and prevent executives from receiving outsized rewards for overly risky gambles.
Last year those regulators, many appointed by former President Barack Obama, a Democrat, rolled out a 500-page rule over many weeks that would require senior executives to return bonuses earned by making decisions that materially hurt their banks.
But in the biannual White House agenda on regulation, the rule was listed under the heading “long-term action,” instead of one denoting regulators were making progress toward a final version. In Washington-speak that meant the rule was dead.
The move followed President Donald Trump’s campaign pledges to lighten federal regulations that hurt liquidity and strangled business.
“They’re not even working on it,” said Lisa Gilbert, who closely tracks Dodd-Frank implementation for the liberal-leaning public interest group Public Citizen.
She added that the rule was labeled “pending” in previous agendas. By law it was supposed to be completed by 2011.
Agencies working on the proposed rule declined to comment.
Regulators neglected last year’s proposal, which addressed many concerns raised about a 2011 draft, even though Obama pushed them to finish it before he left office.
“We kind of knew it was on the back-burner,” said Alexander Monterrubio, director of regulatory affairs for the National Association of Federal Credit Unions trade group. “The unified agenda confirmed that thought.”
Each agency had a different view on regulating incentive-based compensation, making progress difficult, Monterrubio said.
Congress wanted a way to hold top executives accountable after the 2007-09 financial crisis, when some banks experienced major losses partly due to risky decisions made by their leaders. The call for a rule was renewed when regulators rapped Wells Fargo & Co. for an incentive method that pushed employees to open thousands of phantom accounts in customers’ names.
But it was politics that likely proved the rule’s downfall.
Agencies give the White House lists of their regulatory priorities, which makes changes based on the president’s goals and then publishes what is called the “unified agenda.”
Monterrubio said of the rule: “It wasn’t going to happen under President Trump.”
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-regulation-banking-idUSKBN1A602B
