{"id":62668,"date":"2018-04-10T07:41:30","date_gmt":"2018-04-10T07:41:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/?p=62668"},"modified":"2018-04-10T07:41:30","modified_gmt":"2018-04-10T07:41:30","slug":"the-first-four-cylinder-chevrolet-camaro-was-really-bad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/technology\/the-first-four-cylinder-chevrolet-camaro-was-really-bad.html","title":{"rendered":"The First Four Cylinder Chevrolet Camaro Was Really Bad"},"content":{"rendered":"

The First Four Cylinder Chevrolet Camaro Was Really Bad<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n

The freshly redesigned sixth-gen 2019 Chevrolet Camaro was revealed today alongside welcomed news of a 1LE track package for the 2.0-liter turbo engine. To counter this good example of a four-cylinder Camaro, let\u2019s look at the worst example\u2014the third-gen 1982 car with the infamous Iron Duke engine.<\/span><\/p>\n

The 2019 Chevrolet Camaro\u2019s new 1LE Turbo package is a promising lower-tier muscle car, considering it comes with a four-cylinder. It\u2019s only available with a six-speed manual transmission and gets suspension upgrades, Brembo brakes, wide summer tires, \u201cSport\u201d and \u201cTrack\u201d drive modes and, according to GM, \u201cnearly\u201d 50-50 weight distribution.<\/span><\/p>\n

The new Camaro 1LE Turbo has 275 horsepower, or roughly three times the 90 HP \u201cIron Duke\u201d engine of the very first four-cylinder Camaro introduced back in 1981.<\/span><\/p>\n

That\u2019s right\u2014the all-new third-generation Camaro introduced for the 1982 model year, allegedly still intended to be defined as a muscle car, had an engine option with a double-digit horsepower figure. The Iron Duke engine was purely a product of the Malaise Era scramble to sacrifice performance for fuel economy and to meet government emissions standards following the fuel crisis and influx of Japanese competition. It resulted in one of the worst-performing Camaros ever sold.<\/span><\/p>\n

The infamously weak, Pontiac-built Iron Duke engine was a 2.5-liter fuel-injected pushrod straight-four, which was essentially just one cylinder bank from a contemporary Pontiac V8. Production of the Iron Duke started in 1977 and continued until 1993, landing in cars across every General Motors brand except for Cadillac, including third-gen Camaros from 1982 through 1986.<\/span><\/p>\n

GM never intended for the Iron Duke to be a performance engine, despite it showing up in seemingly-performance-oriented models like the thrid-gen Camaro and Pontiac Fiero. The Duke\u2019d Camaro had an embarrassing zero to 60 MPH time of somewhere around 20 seconds. It also had an admittedly reasonable 132 lb-ft of torque to go with its measly 90 HP figure. Still, there was a big disconnect in the refreshed aerodynamic and sporty look of the then-new four-cylinder Camaro and how it actually drove.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Iron Duke was only available in the base \u201cSport Coupe\u201d Camaro trim, and the engine got a boost to 92 HP for the 1983 model year. It was originally available with a four-speed manual as standard, with a three-speed automatic available at extra cost.<\/span><\/p>\n

In 1984, the transmission choices upgraded to a five-speed manual and four-speed auto. The V6 option was only a $250 premium, and replaced the Iron Duke as the standard option for the Camaro in 1986. I\u2019m not sure anybody really noticed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Here\u2019s how GM Parts Center described the Iron Duke Camaro:<\/span><\/p>\n

If you were to do a quick Google search for \u201cThe Worst Cars Of All Time,\u201d the 1982 \u201cIron Duke\u201d Camaro would inevitably be named. Remember that up to that point, the Camaro was a legendary and successful sports car. But when the newly designed 1982 \u201cIron Duke\u201d Camaro made its debut, the 90 hp engine left something to be desired. In the book Automotive Atrocities: The Cars We Love to Hate, author Eric Peters said that its drivers were forced to go through \u201cthe humiliation of being left in the dust by K-car station wagons.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Time ranked the Iron Duke Camaro number 36 on a list of the 50 worst cars ever built, it was number two on Complex\u2019s list of the 50 worst cars of the 1980s, and as Autoblog points out, Chevrolet didn\u2019t sell very many of them.<\/span><\/p>\n

The third-gen Camaro sans the horrible Iron Duke wasn\u2019t bad, though. The V8 Z28 model was noted for its sharp handling and won Motor Trend\u2019s performance car of the year award in 1982. So just the 90 horsepower model sucked, which makes sense. The four-cylinder Camaro has come a long way.<\/span><\/p>\n

Source:-https:\/\/jalopnik.com\/chevrolets-first-four-cylinder-camaro-was-really-bad-1825128229<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t