{"id":61843,"date":"2018-03-31T04:33:52","date_gmt":"2018-03-31T04:33:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/?p=61843"},"modified":"2018-03-31T04:45:39","modified_gmt":"2018-03-31T04:45:39","slug":"stephon-clark-was-shot-8-times-primarily-in-his-back-family-ordered-autopsy-finds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/news\/stephon-clark-was-shot-8-times-primarily-in-his-back-family-ordered-autopsy-finds.html","title":{"rendered":"Stephon Clark Was Shot 8 Times Primarily in His Back, Family-Ordered Autopsy Finds"},"content":{"rendered":"

Stephon Clark Was Shot 8 Times Primarily in His Back, Family-Ordered Autopsy Finds<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n

Stephon Clark, the unarmed black man who was fatally shot last week by Sacramento police officers, was struck eight times, mostly in his back, according to an independent autopsy released Friday, raising significant questions about the police account that he was a threat to officers when he was hit.<\/span><\/p>\n

The autopsy \u2014 commissioned by the family of Mr. Clark, 22, and conducted by Dr. Bennet Omalu, a private medical examiner \u2014 showed that he was shot three times in his lower back, twice near his right shoulder, once in his neck and once under an armpit. He was also shot in the leg. The neck wound was from the side, the doctor found, and he said that while the shot to the leg hit Mr. Clark in the front, it appeared to have been fired after he was already falling.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cHe was shot from the back,\u201d Dr. Omalu said Friday at a news conference. Standing next to diagrams of the findings, he said that seven of the shots could have had a \u201cfatal capacity.\u201d He described severe damage to Mr. Clark\u2019s body, including a shattered vertebrae, a collapsed lung and an arm broken into \u201ctiny bits.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cHe bled massively,\u201d said Dr. Omalu, who became nationally known for his fight with the National Football League over head injuries to its players.<\/span><\/p>\n

Dr. Omalu said he believed the first bullet to hit Mr. Clark on his side caused him to turn, so he was facing away from the officers when they fired the barrage of bullets.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Sacramento police on Friday said they had not viewed the autopsy and declined to comment, saying it was \u201cinappropriate\u201d because the investigation was continuing. \u201cWe acknowledge the importance of this case to all in our community,\u201d the police said in a statement.<\/span><\/p>\n

Protesters in California\u2019s capital have taken to the streets nearly every day since Mr. Clark was killed on March 18, demanding that the city\u2019s leadership fire the two officers involved.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Clark\u2019s family have accused the police department of trying to cover up misconduct by its officers and decided to conduct its own autopsy.<\/span><\/p>\n

Video showed officers shouting at Mr. Clark minutes after the shooting stopped. \u201cWe need to know if you\u2019re O.K.,\u201d an officer yelled about three minutes after the gunfire ended. \u201cWe need to get you medics but we can\u2019t go over to get you help unless we know you don\u2019t have a weapon.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Dr. Omalu said the autopsy suggested that Mr. Clark lived for three to 10 minutes after the shooting, adding to questions about the amount of time it took to get him treatment. Medical assistance did not arrive until about six minutes after the shooting.<\/span><\/p>\n

Dr. Omalu said that he could not determine if Mr. Clark would have survived if he had received medical attention more quickly, but \u201cevery minute you wait decreases probability of survival.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

In its initial account, the Police Department said Mr. Clark had \u201cadvanced toward the officers\u201d while holding what they believed to be a firearm. In body camera footage provided by the police, it is not clear which direction Mr. Clark is facing, and the family\u2019s lawyer, Benjamin Crump, said the independent autopsy contradicted the assertion by the police that he was a threat.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Crump said the results proved that Mr. Clark could not have been moving toward the officers in a threatening fashion when they opened fire.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThese findings from the independent autopsy contradict the police narrative that we\u2019ve been told,\u201d he said. \u201cThis independent autopsy affirms that Stephon was not a threat to police and was slain in another senseless police killing under increasingly questionable circumstances.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Outside experts who have examined the case say it will be difficult to determine whether the officers could be held criminally accountable. The Supreme Court has sided with the police in fatal shootings if it is shown that officers reasonably believe their lives were in danger.<\/span><\/p>\n

Justin Nix, who teaches policing at the University of Nebraska Omaha, said, \u201cAny police shooting on camera is going to look bad. But when the guy is on his stomach and they continue to shoot, a lot of people are going to be bothered by it.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Nix agreed the autopsy undercut the police\u2019s version of events, but said: \u201cHe\u2019s facing slightly in their direction. And it is possible they felt he was still reaching for what they thought was a gun.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

David A. Harris, a professor at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law who studies police accountability, said the officers were at a disadvantage because they were relying on information about the suspect from a police helicopter circling overhead.<\/span><\/p>\n

Once they confront the suspect however, the officers order Mr. Clark to \u201cshow\u201d his hands, rather than raise his hands, which Mr. Clark may have been doing when he was shot, Mr. Harris said.<\/span><\/p>\n

But he said that if the officers perceived that Mr. Clark was armed and moving toward them, they are trained to shoot. \u201cIt is not clear they could have done anything differently,\u201d he said.<\/span><\/p>\n

The shots to Mr. Clark\u2019s back were \u201cnot enough by itself to seal a negative judgment,\u201d he said. In part because, \u201cthe victim\u2019s body may have turned after the shooting began, and it is still unclear whether they could see that he had turned.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The Sacramento police chief, Daniel Hahn, requested assistance from the California Department of Justice earlier this week, headed by Attorney General Xavier Becerra, to join the department\u2019s investigation as an independent party. Mr. Hahn said he hoped that step would reassure residents that the investigation would be impartial.<\/span><\/p>\n

The episode began when two officers were dispatched to the Meadowview neighborhood in South Sacramento to investigate a report that someone was breaking car windows. A county sheriff\u2019s department helicopter joined the search and hovered above, at one point telling officers that a suspect had picked up a crowbar.<\/span><\/p>\n

The officers eventually spotted Mr. Clark, who appears to have run from them into his grandmother\u2019s backyard. In body camera video, an officer is heard shouting the word \u201cgun\u201d repeatedly and opening fire almost immediately. No weapon was found on Mr. Clark\u2019s body; the only object found was his cellphone.<\/span><\/p>\n

After other officers arrived, the two officers involved in the shooting muted the audio on their body cameras as they discussed what had happened, which has also drawn criticism.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Clark\u2019s funeral was on Thursday, attended by hundreds of mourners, including the Rev. Al Sharpton and other leaders from the Blacks Lives Matter movement. Mr. Clark\u2019s brother, Stevante, pleaded with supporters not to forget his brother. Protests over the shooting, which have spread nationwide, are planned to continue on Saturday.<\/span><\/p>\n

Source:-https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/03\/30\/us\/stephon-clark-independent-autopsy.html<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t