{"id":58773,"date":"2018-02-14T05:03:26","date_gmt":"2018-02-14T05:03:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/?p=58773"},"modified":"2018-02-14T08:57:13","modified_gmt":"2018-02-14T08:57:13","slug":"white-house-let-rob-porter-keep-job-even-after-receiving-final-f-b-i-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/news\/white-house-let-rob-porter-keep-job-even-after-receiving-final-f-b-i-report.html","title":{"rendered":"White House Let Rob Porter Keep Job Even After Receiving Final F.B.I. Report"},"content":{"rendered":"

White House Let Rob Porter Keep Job Even After Receiving Final F.B.I. Report<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

The White House changed its story on Tuesday about how it handled allegations of spousal abuse against Rob Porter, the staff secretary who resigned in disgrace last week, conceding that the F.B.I. told White House career officials last summer about problems in Mr. Porter\u2019s background check. But members of President Trump\u2019s team said top advisers in the West Wing were kept in the dark.<\/span><\/p>\n

The White House revised its version of events after testimony on Capitol Hill from the F.B.I. director, Christopher A. Wray, contradicted earlier and shifting claims from the West Wing.<\/span><\/p>\n

At a previously scheduled Senate hearing on Tuesday about threats against the United States, Mr. Wray, in response to a question about Mr. Porter, said the F.B.I. had given the White House final results in January of its background investigation into the former staff secretary. Mr. Wray\u2019s account was directly at odds with previous assertions by Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, and other White House officials who said Mr. Porter\u2019s background check was still underway when the domestic violence abuse allegations from his two former wives came to light last week in news reports.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Wray\u2019s words strongly suggested that Mr. Porter, who had been given an interim security clearance, was allowed to continue serving in his influential post in the West Wing long after officials had received word of the troublesome accusations. Three officials confirmed late Tuesday that the practice of giving interim security clearances to new hires in the White House was halted last fall by Mr. Trump\u2019s chief of staff. Politico first reported the change.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Wray\u2019s testimony also raised questions about the credibility of Mr. Trump\u2019s most senior advisers and the degree of tolerance they may have shown to a colleague apparently eager to cover up a past.<\/span><\/p>\n

According to Mr. Wray, the F.B.I. updated the White House three times in 2017 \u2014 in March, July and November \u2014 about Mr. Porter\u2019s background check as it progressed. Mr. Wray did not disclose the information that was given to the White House at those times, but according to two people briefed on the matter, the F.B.I. first provided the White House in July with a rundown of the spousal abuse allegations the bureau had uncovered against Mr. Porter.<\/span><\/p>\n

In November, the F.B.I. provided the White House with additional information about the allegations.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ms. Sanders insisted Tuesday that senior West Wing officials had not learned about the allegations against Mr. Porter until they surfaced in The Daily Mail because the F.B.I. gave the information to the White House Personnel Security Office, which handles security clearances. The office is in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next door to the White House and is overseen by Joe Hagin, the deputy chief of staff.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ms. Sanders said that the security office \u2014 which she repeatedly noted was staffed by \u201ccareer officials,\u201d who would not have been appointed by Mr. Trump \u2014 had not yet made a final determination on whether Mr. Porter should receive his security clearance at the time of The Mail\u2019s article.<\/span><\/p>\n

Still, pressed on whether senior officials \u2014 including John F. Kelly, the chief of staff; Donald F. McGahn II, the White House counsel; and Mr. Hagin \u2014 could have been unaware as far back as last summer that such a significant issue had been raised about one of the president\u2019s closest aides, she conceded she could not be certain.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cNot that I\u2019m aware of,\u201d Ms. Sanders said. \u201cI can\u2019t say with 100 percent certainty.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

According to the two people briefed on the matter, the White House security office reviewed the allegations about Mr. Porter in July and saw that the F.B.I. had interviewed Mr. Porter\u2019s two former wives but not Mr. Porter himself. The office asked the F.B.I. to go back and do so, said the two people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the case.<\/span><\/p>\n

In November, the F.B.I. provided another report to the security office, the two people said, adding that at that point, a final review began to determine whether to grant Mr. Porter a security clearance. As part of that review, three officials in the personnel office, including its head, were supposed to come to their own conclusions about whether to grant the clearance, the people said.<\/span><\/p>\n

By the time The Mail published its article last week, only one of those officials had made a determination, the two people said, although it is not clear what the official had concluded.<\/span><\/p>\n

In late November last year, a distraught girlfriend of Mr. Porter\u2019s contacted Mr. McGahn and told him Mr. Porter had been unfaithful to her by dating Hope Hicks, the White House communications director, and had anger problems, according to several people familiar with the discussion. Mr. McGahn, who knew Mr. Porter\u2019s girlfriend, at that point suggested to Mr. Porter he should consider leaving the White House, the people said. But Mr. McGahn did not follow up on the matter.<\/span><\/p>\n

One former White House official, Anthony Scaramucci, who lasted 10 days last year as White House communications director before being removed by Mr. Kelly, weighed in on Tuesday on Mr. Wray\u2019s testimony. Mr. Scaramucci posted on Twitter that Mr. Kelly \u201calmost certainly knew about credible allegations of domestic abuse against Rob Porter at least 6 months ago – then recently forced others to lie about that timeline.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cInexcusable,\u201d Mr. Scaramucci added. \u201cKelly must resign.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Ms. Sanders said Mr. Trump maintained confidence in Mr. Kelly, who told The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday that he had no regrets about how Mr. Porter\u2019s case was handled, adding that \u201cit was all done right.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Porter, who as staff secretary handled all of the documents that made their way to the president, had in the weeks before the allegations been seeking an expanded portfolio in the West Wing, where experienced aides who can bring order to a chaotic operation are in short supply.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Trump\u2019s aides initially said they had no inkling of the accusations against Mr. Porter until the reports in The Mail, and said they acted swiftly to terminate him when they discovered them. In fact, the White House spent the first hours after learning of the accusations \u2014 including the publication of photographs of one of Mr. Porter\u2019s former wives with a black eye she said he had given her \u2014 defending Mr. Porter against the allegations and insisting that he was not being dismissed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Even after Mr. Kelly changed his stance, calling the allegations vile and orchestrating Mr. Porter\u2019s swift departure, the president has stuck up for Mr. Porter publicly, telling reporters that the situation had been \u201ctough\u201d and \u201csad\u201d for Mr. Porter. The president insisted that Mr. Porter had denied the accusations, and wished him a successful career. On Tuesday, asked by reporters at a White House event with sheriffs if he had a message for victims of abuse, Mr. Trump declined to answer.<\/span><\/p>\n

On Capitol Hill, lawmakers in both parties criticized how the White House had handled the episode.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cA lot of us are concerned about what has come to light in terms of these background checks \u2014 how long they take, how long somebody can be in an interim status and still have access to classified material,\u201d said Senator Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona. He said the scandal had exacerbated a generational divide that was already plaguing the party.<\/span><\/p>\n

Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York, said Mr. Trump, who dispatched Ms. Sanders yesterday to denounce domestic violence but has not addressed the matter himself, had missed an opportunity.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cI haven\u2019t heard the president say something directly about how bad domestic abuse is,\u201d he told reporters on Tuesday. \u201cYou know, to have a spokesperson get out and say something is not good enough.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Source:-\u00a0https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/02\/13\/us\/politics\/rob-porter-fbi-background-check.html<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t