{"id":51133,"date":"2017-11-08T04:48:20","date_gmt":"2017-11-08T04:48:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/?p=51133"},"modified":"2017-11-08T04:48:20","modified_gmt":"2017-11-08T04:48:20","slug":"winners-and-losers-from-election-day-2017","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/elections\/winners-and-losers-from-election-day-2017.html","title":{"rendered":"Winners and losers from Election Day 2017"},"content":{"rendered":"

Winners and losers from Election Day 2017<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

We now have new governors-elect of New Jersey and Virginia \u2014 along with a whole bunch of new data on where the Democratic and Republican parties currently stand in American politics.<\/span><\/p>\n

Election Day 2017 is just about in the books, with Democrats Phil Murphy and Ralph Northam winning the governor’s mansions in New Jersey and Virginia, respectively. The latter won the biggest and most closely watched race of the night, giving Democrats a shot in the arm after a tough electoral year. And plenty of signs Tuesday pointed to a very good night for Democrats.<\/span><\/p>\n

Below, we break down the winners and losers.<\/span><\/p>\n

WINNERS<\/span>
\nDemocrats\u2019 morale<\/span><\/p>\n

It\u2019s become clear that Democrats have the momentum across the country. That\u2019s apparent most notably in special elections, where they\u2019ve very often beaten their 2016 presidential election performance, and also on the generic congressional ballot, where they lead in a few recent polls by double digits.<\/span><\/p>\n

But they\u2019ve thus far been unable to win the big ones, and that has led to plenty of grumbling about their ability to win when it counts. Their loss in a special congressional election in Georgia was particularly painful, given that they invested tens of millions of dollars in a conservative-leaning suburban Atlanta district but still did no better than Hillary Clinton did there in 2016. Northam’s victory in Virginia should give Democrats confidence that they aren’t totally feckless with the spotlight of the political world upon them.<\/span><\/p>\n

And as the night progresses, it’s looking like it will be even better than they might have hoped.<\/span><\/p>\n

The transgender community<\/span><\/p>\n

It’s one state legislative race, but transgender candidate Danica Roem’s win for a House of Delegates seat in Virginia is huge symbolically. The Democrat defeated a social conservative icon in Del. Bob Marshall (R), a 26-year incumbent who once called himself Virginia’s \u201cchief homophobe.\u201d And she did it by about 10 points. Oh, and in doing so, she becomes the first openly transgender candidate elected to a state legislature in American history.<\/span><\/p>\n

Overcoming tragedy<\/span><\/p>\n

One of the winners for the Virginia House of Delegates is Chris Hurst (D). For those who may vaguely remember that name, he is a former local TV news anchor whose girlfriend, Alison Parker, a reporter at the same station, was killed on live TV, along with a cameraman, by a disturbed former colleague in 2015. Hurst quit his job this year to run for office in her memory, and he won Tuesday in one of several surprises for Democrats.<\/span><\/p>\n

Democrats’ redistricting hopes<\/span><\/p>\n

After the 2016 elections, The Fix’s Amber Phillips and I spotlighted seven governors’ races in the coming years that would be huge for Democrats’ ability to prevent another drubbing in redistricting after the 2020 Census. Topping that list was Virginia.<\/span><\/p>\n

Basically, Democrats in many swing states are in such rough shape in their legislatures that they need to capture the governor’s mansion to prevent the GOP from drawing their next legislative and congressional maps. That places a premium on these races if Democrats want to have a good shot at winning back the House majority anytime soon. One down, six to go.<\/span><\/p>\n

Oh, and Democrats also put a huge dent in the GOP’s big advantage in the Virginia House of Delegates. It even looked like they might take the majority \u2014 something that had seemed unthinkable.<\/span><\/p>\n

LOSERS<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump-style nationalism<\/span><\/p>\n

Both Republican gubernatorial nominees \u2014 former Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie in Virginia and Lt. Gov. Kim Guadagno in New Jersey \u2014 ran with a version of Trump’s nationalistic, often dark anti-illegal-immigration message. And neither saw it pay off. Gillespie’s use of the strategy was particularly jarring, given that he is basically the very definition of the kind of establishment Republican who has eschewed that kind of approach.<\/span><\/p>\n

For a time, it seemed that the strategy might be helping Gillespie close the gap, but in the end it doesn’t seem to have helped much at all. And the idea that this is a way forward for the GOP in winning elections in swing states such as Virginia was certainly dealt a setback.<\/span><\/p>\n

In some ways, of course, that might be reassuring to the GOP establishment, which worries about the short-term gains and long-term problems this strategy might create.<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump is taking some liberties here. As mentioned above, Gillespie did embrace some of Trump’s agenda, even if he didn’t exactly say he loved Trump. The president also cut a robo-call for Gillespie that went out on Election Day. And the idea that he just needed to bear-hug Trump a little more doesn’t really hold up, given that he lost by a large margin.<\/span><\/p>\n

But think about what this says to other Republicans who may be on the fence about how to handle Trump in their races. Trump just threw Gillespie under the bus, and within minutes of his loss. The president \u2014 with some help from former top aide Stephen K. Bannon \u2014 seems quite willing to attack Republicans who don’t toe the line, and that could force some Republicans into an uneasy choice.<\/span><\/p>\n

Steve Bannon<\/span><\/p>\n

The Breitbart head who is now targeting incumbent GOP senators in primaries seemed to see a good talking point coming down the pike \u2014 even if Gillespie just kept it close. He looks foolish now.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cHe\u2019s closed an enthusiasm gap by rallying around the Trump agenda,\u201d Bannon said of Gillespie in a weekend piece in the New York Times. \u201cAnd I think the big lesson for Tuesday is that, in Gillespie\u2019s case, Trumpism without Trump can show the way forward. If that\u2019s the case, Democrats better be very, very worried.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Except, not so much. Bannon’s comments not only fly in the face of Trump’s tweet, but they make it look like he totally misplayed the expectations game here \u2014 dealing a blow to his supposed political acumen.<\/span><\/p>\n

Chris Christie<\/span><\/p>\n

It may not be terribly surprising, given the overwhelming polling evidence that already showed that New Jersey hates its two-term, outgoing governor, but the numbers Tuesday in the Garden State were damning. About half of voters said their view of Christie predisposed them against Guadagno in her steep uphill battle to succeed him.<\/span><\/p>\n

For comparison\u2019s sake, only about one-third of Virginians said Trump made them less likely to support Gillespie. The number who said Christie made them more likely to back Guadagno was in the single digits. We\u2019re a long way from Christie\u2019s 22-point reelection win just four short years ago.<\/span><\/p>\n

Source:-\u00a0https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/the-fix\/wp\/2017\/11\/07\/winners-and-losers-from-election-day-2017\/?utm_term=.58faf1c93866<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t