{"id":43491,"date":"2017-09-08T05:02:23","date_gmt":"2017-09-08T05:02:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/?p=43491"},"modified":"2017-09-08T05:03:18","modified_gmt":"2017-09-08T05:03:18","slug":"the-fake-americans-russia-created-to-influence-the-election","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/news\/the-fake-americans-russia-created-to-influence-the-election.html","title":{"rendered":"The Fake Americans Russia Created to Influence the Election"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Fake Americans Russia Created to Influence the Election<\/span><\/strong><\/h2>\n

The Fake Americans Russia Created to Influence the Election:- Sometimes an international offensive begins with a few shots that draw little notice. So it was last year when Melvin Redick of Harrisburg, Pa., a friendly-looking American with a backward baseball cap and a young daughter, posted on Facebook a link to a brand-new website.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThese guys show hidden truth about Hillary Clinton, George Soros and other leaders of the US,\u201d he wrote on June 8, 2016. \u201cVisit #DCLeaks website. It\u2019s really interesting!\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Redick turned out to be a remarkably elusive character. No Melvin Redick appears in Pennsylvania records, and his photos seem to be borrowed from an unsuspecting Brazilian. But this fictional concoction has earned a small spot in history: The Redick posts that morning were among the first public signs of an unprecedented foreign intervention in American democracy.<\/span><\/p>\n

The DCLeaks site had gone live a few days earlier, posting the first samples of material, stolen from prominent Americans by Russian hackers, that would reverberate through the presidential election campaign and into the Trump presidency. The site\u2019s phony promoters were in the vanguard of a cyberarmy of counterfeit Facebook and Twitter accounts, a legion of Russian-controlled impostors whose operations are still being unraveled.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Russian information attack on the election did not stop with the hacking and leaking of Democratic emails or the fire hose of stories, true, false and in between, that battered Mrs. Clinton on Russian outlets like RT and Sputnik. Far less splashy, and far more difficult to trace, was Russia\u2019s experimentation on Facebook and Twitter, the American companies that essentially invented the tools of social media and, in this case, did not stop them from being turned into engines of deception and propaganda.<\/span><\/p>\n

An investigation by The New York Times, and new research from the cybersecurity firm FireEye, reveals some of the mechanisms by which suspected Russian operators used Twitter and Facebook to spread anti-Clinton messages and promote the hacked material they had leaked. On Wednesday, Facebook officials disclosed that they had shut down several hundred accounts that they believe were created by a Russian company linked to the Kremlin and used to buy $100,000 in ads pushing divisive issues during and after the American election campaign.<\/span><\/p>\n

On Twitter, as on Facebook, Russian fingerprints are on hundreds or thousands of fake accounts that regularly posted anti-Clinton messages. Many were automated Twitter accounts, called bots, that sometimes fired off identical messages seconds apart \u2014 and in the exact alphabetical order of their made-up names, according to the FireEye researchers. On Election Day, for instance, they found that one group of Twitter bots sent out the hashtag #WarAgainstDemocrats more than 1,700 times.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Russian efforts were sometimes crude or off-key, with a trial-and-error feel, and many of the suspect posts were not widely shared. The fakery may have added only modestly to the din of genuine American voices in the pre-election melee, but it helped fuel a fire of anger and suspicion in a polarized country.<\/span><\/p>\n

Given the powerful role of social media in political contests, understanding the Russian efforts will be crucial in preventing or blunting similar, or more sophisticated, attacks in the 2018 congressional races and the 2020 presidential election. Multiple government agencies have investigated the Russian attack, though it remains unclear whether any agency is focused specifically on tracking foreign intervention in social media. Both Facebook and Twitter say they are studying the 2016 experience and how to defend against such meddling.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe know we have to stay vigilant to keep ahead of people who try to misuse our platform,\u201d Alex Stamos, Facebook\u2019s chief security officer, wrote on Wednesday in a post about the Russia-linked fake accounts and ads. \u201cWe believe in protecting the integrity of civic discourse.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Critics say that because shareholders judge the companies partly based on a crucial data point \u2014 \u201cmonthly active users\u201d \u2014 they are reluctant to police their sites too aggressively for fear of reducing that number. The companies use technical tools and teams of analysts to detect bogus accounts, but the scale of the sites \u2014 328 million users on Twitter, nearly two billion on Facebook \u2014 means they often remove impostors only in response to complaints.<\/span><\/p>\n

Though both companies have been slow to grapple with the problem of manipulation, they have stepped up efforts to purge fake accounts. Facebook says it takes down a million accounts a day \u2014 including some that were related to the recent French election and upcoming German voting \u2014 but struggles to keep up with the illicit activity. Still, the company says the abuse affects only a small fraction of the social network; Facebook officials estimated that of all the \u201ccivic content\u201d posted on the site in connection with the United States election, less than one-tenth of one percent resulted from \u201cinformation operations\u201d like the Russian campaign.<\/span><\/p>\n

Twitter, unlike Facebook, does not require the use of a real name and does not prohibit automated accounts, arguing that it seeks to be a forum for open debate. But it constantly updates a \u201ctrends\u201d list of most-discussed topics or hashtags, and it says it tries to foil attempts to use bots to create fake trends. However, FireEye found that the suspected Russian bots sometimes managed to do just that, in one case causing the hashtag #HillaryDown to be listed as a trend.<\/span><\/p>\n

Clinton Watts, a former F.B.I. agent who has closely tracked Russian activity online, said that Facebook and Twitter suffered from a \u201cbot cancer eroding trust on their platforms.\u201d But he added that while Facebook \u201chas begun cutting out the tumors by deleting false accounts and fighting fake news,\u201d Twitter has done little and as a result, \u201cbots have only spread since the election.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Asked to comment, Twitter referred to a blog post in June in which it said it was \u201cdoubling down\u201d on efforts to prevent manipulation but could not reveal details for fear of tipping off those trying to evade the company\u2019s measures. But it declared that Twitter\u2019s \u201copen and real-time nature is a powerful antidote\u201d to falsehoods.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThis is important because we cannot distinguish whether every single Tweet from every person is truthful or not,\u201d the statement said. \u201cWe, as a company, should not be the arbiter of truth.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Leaks and Counterfeit Profiles<\/span><\/p>\n

Russia has been quite open about playing its hacking card. In February last year, at a conference in Moscow, a top cyberintelligence adviser to President Vladimir V. Putin hinted that Russia was about to unleash a devastating information attack on the United States.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe are living in 1948,\u201d said the adviser, Andrey Krutskikh, referring to the eve of the first Soviet atomic bomb test, in a speech reported by The Washington Post. \u201cI\u2019m warning you: We are at the verge of having something in the information arena that will allow to us to talk to the Americans as equals.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Putin\u2019s denials of Russian meddling have been coy. In June, he allowed that \u201cfree-spirited\u201d hackers might have awakened in a good mood one day and spontaneously decided to contribute to \u201cthe fight against those who say bad things about Russia.\u201d Speaking to NBC News, he rejected the idea that evidence pointed to Russia \u2014 while showing a striking familiarity with how cyberattackers might cover their tracks.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIP addresses can be simply made up,\u201d Mr. Putin said, referring to Internet protocol addresses, which can identify particular computers. \u201cThere are such IT specialists in the world today, and they can arrange anything and then blame it on whomever. This is no proof.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Putin had a point. Especially in the social media realm, attributing fake accounts \u2014 to Russia or to any other source \u2014 is always challenging. In January, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency concluded \u201cwith high confidence\u201d that Mr. Putin had ordered an influence operation to damage Mrs. Clinton\u2019s campaign and eventually aid Donald J. Trump\u2019s. In April, Facebook published a public report on information operations using fake accounts. It shied away from naming Russia as the culprit until Wednesday, when the company said it had removed 470 \u201cinauthentic\u201d accounts and pages that were \u201clikely operated out of Russia.\u201d Facebook officials fingered a St. Petersburg company with Kremlin ties called the Internet Research Agency.<\/span><\/p>\n

Russia deliberately blurs its role in influence operations, American intelligence officials say. Even skilled investigators often cannot be sure if a particular Facebook post or Twitter bot came from Russian intelligence employees, paid \u201ctrolls\u201d in Eastern Europe or hackers from Russia\u2019s vast criminal underground. A Russian site called buyaccs.com (\u201cBuy Bulk Accounts at Best Prices\u201d) offers for sale a huge array of pre-existing social media accounts, including on Facebook and Twitter; like wine, the older accounts cost more, because their history makes chicanery harder to spot.<\/span><\/p>\n

The trail that leads from the Russian operation to the bogus Melvin Redick, however, is fairly clear. United States intelligence concluded that DCLeaks.com was created in June 2016 by the Russian military intelligence agency G.R.U. The site began publishing an eclectic collection of hacked emails, notably from George Soros, the financier and Democratic donor, as well as a former NATO commander and some Democratic and Republican staffers. Some of the website\u2019s language \u2014 calling Mrs. Clinton \u201cPresident of the Democratic Party\u201d and referring to her \u201celectional staff\u201d \u2014 seemed to belie its pose as a forum run by American activists.<\/span><\/p>\n

DCLeaks would soon be followed by a blog called Guccifer 2.0, which would leave even more clues of its Russian origin. Those sites\u2019 posts, however, would then be dwarfed by those from WikiLeaks, which American officials believe got thousands of Democratic emails from Russian intelligence hackers through an intermediary. At each stage, a chorus of dubious Facebook and Twitter accounts \u2014 alongside many legitimate ones \u2014 would applaud the leaks.<\/span><\/p>\n

During its first weeks online, DCLeaks drew no media attention. But The Times found that some Facebook users somehow discovered the new site quickly and began promoting it on June 8. One was the Redick account, which posted about DCLeaks to the Facebook groups \u201cWorld News Headlines\u201d and \u201cBreaking News \u2014 World.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The Redick profile lists Central High School in Philadelphia and Indiana University of Pennsylvania as his alma maters; neither has any record of his attendance. In one of his photos, this purported Pennsylvania lifer is sitting in a restaurant in Brazil \u2014 and in another, his daughter\u2019s bedroom appears to have a Brazilian-style electrical outlet. His posts were never personal, just news articles reflecting a pro-Russian worldview.<\/span><\/p>\n

Source:-\u00a0https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/09\/07\/us\/politics\/russia-facebook-twitter-election.html?mcubz=1<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t