{"id":37256,"date":"2017-07-28T07:32:12","date_gmt":"2017-07-28T07:32:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/?p=37256"},"modified":"2017-07-28T07:32:12","modified_gmt":"2017-07-28T07:32:12","slug":"trump-seeks-way-declare-iran-violation-nuclear-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/news\/trump-seeks-way-declare-iran-violation-nuclear-deal.html","title":{"rendered":"Trump Seeks Way to Declare Iran in Violation of Nuclear Deal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Trump Seeks Way to Declare Iran in Violation of Nuclear Deal<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

President Trump, frustrated that his national security aides have not given him any options on how the United States can leave the Iran nuclear deal, has instructed them to find a rationale for declaring that the country is violating the terms of the accord.<\/span><\/p>\n

American officials have already told allies they should be prepared to join in reopening negotiations with Iran or expect that the United States may abandon the agreement, as it did the Paris climate accord. And according to several foreign officials, the United States has begun raising with international inspectors in Vienna the possibility of demanding access to military sites in Iran where there is reasonable suspicion of nuclear research or development.<\/span><\/p>\n

If the Iranians balk, as seems likely, their refusal could enable Washington to declare Tehran in violation of the two-year-old deal.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Trump has enormous latitude to abandon the accord. It was never a treaty because President Barack Obama knew that opposition to the agreement in the Republican-dominated Senate was so great that he could never get the two-thirds majority needed for ratification. Instead, he made an executive agreement, one that his successor could eliminate by merely disregarding the accord\u2019s requirement to waive sanctions against Iran.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Trump\u2019s instructions followed a sharp series of exchanges last week with Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson, after Mr. Trump initially balked at certifying, for a second time since he took office, that Iran is in compliance with the agreement. He later reluctantly approved the certification.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Trump had expected to be presented with options for how to get out of the deal, according to two officials, and in the words of one of them, \u201che had a bit of a meltdown when that wasn\u2019t one of the choices.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Trump himself made it clear he does not plan to let that happen again.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019re doing very detailed studies,\u201d he told The Wall Street Journal in an interview this week. Later, he added that when the next 90-day review of the deal comes around \u2014 mandated by Congress two years ago \u2014 \u201cI think they\u2019ll be noncompliant.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

His aides say they are not so sure of the outcome, and they described the studies Mr. Trump referred to as evenhanded efforts to evaluate the costs and benefits of staying inside the deal \u2014 with its sharp limitations on Iran\u2019s ability to produce nuclear fuel for at least the next nine years \u2014 versus abandoning it.<\/span><\/p>\n

Some concede that the diplomatic cost of abandoning the agreement would be high. The other parties to the agreement \u2014 Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia \u2014 do not share Mr. Trump\u2019s objections. If the United States withdraws support for the accord, it will be isolated on the issue, much as it is on the climate change agreement.<\/span><\/p>\n

But the president\u2019s mind seems made up. \u201cLook, I have a lot of respect for Rex and his people, good relationship,\u201d he said of Mr. Tillerson. \u201cIt\u2019s easier to say they comply. It\u2019s a lot easier. But it\u2019s the wrong thing. They don\u2019t comply.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Even longtime critics of the deal in Congress have their doubts about the wisdom of abandoning it. In an interview this week with David Ignatius of The Washington Post, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Bob Corker, Republican of Tennessee, strongly suggested that this is not the moment to abandon something that is largely working.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWhat I say to the president, and this is what Tillerson, Mattis and McMaster say,\u201d said Mr. Corker, referring to Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and the national security adviser, Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, is that \u201cyou can only tear the agreement up one time.\u201d<\/span>
\nRight now, he added, \u201cit\u2019s not like a nuclear weapon is getting ready to be developed.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Absent any urgency, he argued for a more nuanced approach. \u201cRadically enforce it,\u201d he said of the deal, demanding access to \u201cvarious facilities in Iran.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIf they don\u2019t let us in,\u201d Mr. Corker said, \u201cboom.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

He added: \u201cYou want the breakup of this deal to be about Iran. You don\u2019t want it to be about the U.S., because we want our allies with us.\u201d Mr. Tillerson, he said, ultimately wanted to renegotiate a deal that would stop Iran from enriching uranium forever \u2014 a concession it is hard to imagine Iran ever making.<\/span><\/p>\n

Some version of Mr. Corker\u2019s \u201cradical enforcement\u201d is essentially the strategy that national security officials have described in recent days. They deny they are trying to provoke the Iranians. Instead, they say they are testing the utility of the accord so they can report back to Mr. Trump about whether Iran\u2019s interpretation of the provisions of the agreement, and its separate commitments to the International Atomic Energy Agency, would pave the way for international inspectors to go anywhere in the country.<\/span><\/p>\n

That probably sets the stage for some kind of standoff.<\/span><\/p>\n

Iran has long said that its most sensitive military locations are off limits. That issue came to a head in 2015 when international inspectors demanded access to Parchin, a military base near Tehran where there was evidence of past nuclear work. A compromise was worked out in which Iran took environmental samples itself, under surveillance by agency inspectors. The inspectors found little, but the precedent of how the inspection was carried out was cited by critics of the deal as evidence that the Iranians could hide work on uranium enrichment or other technology in off-limits military facilities.<\/span><\/p>\n

It is unclear whether American intelligence agencies possess evidence of potential violations that go beyond suspicions. Several senior intelligence officials have warned there are risks involved in directing the international agency to specific locations, only to discover nothing nefarious. Such an outcome would have echoes, they caution, of the failed effort to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in 2003.<\/span><\/p>\n

One of Mr. Trump\u2019s complaints about the 2015 deal is that it covers only nuclear activity, not support for terrorism, or missile testing, or Iran\u2019s activities in Syria and Iraq. The State Department complained that an Iranian launch of a missile into space on Thursday violated the spirit of the nuclear accord.<\/span><\/p>\n

The missile test was the first by Iran since Mr. Trump took office. But such tests of what are essentially carrier rockets are not prohibited.<\/span><\/p>\n

The missile that was launched is known as a Simorgh, or Phoenix, which experts said was a copy of North Korea\u2019s Unha space launch vehicle. Iran\u2019s national news channel said the rocket was capable of placing satellites weighing up to 250 kilograms, or about 550 pounds, into a low earth orbit of 500 kilometers, or about 300 miles.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nader Karimi Joni, a journalist close to the government of Iran\u2019s president, Hassan Rouhani, said Thursday\u2019s launch was a reaction to the House of Representatives\u2019 vote on Tuesday approving a new round of sanctions against Iran. The Senate approved the bill Thursday night.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIran is boosting its missile capabilities in order to increase the accuracy, preciseness and range,\u201d Mr. Joni said. \u201cIran will not stop the missile projects.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

In a sign of continuing struggles over Iran policy, the White House confirmed that Derek Harvey, the head of Middle East affairs on the National Security Council, was removed from his post on Thursday. No explanation was given, but Mr. Harvey was known to be especially hawkish about Iran\u2019s role in the region, and he was appointed by the previous national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn. Mr. Harvey was widely reported to have been at odds with General McMaster, the current national security adviser, on Middle East policy.<\/span><\/p>\n

source:-https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/07\/27\/world\/middleeast\/trump-iran-nuclear-agreement.html?<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t