{"id":33864,"date":"2017-07-06T04:44:05","date_gmt":"2017-07-06T04:44:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/?p=33864"},"modified":"2017-07-06T04:44:05","modified_gmt":"2017-07-06T04:44:05","slug":"uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/news\/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief.html","title":{"rendered":"Uncovering the Russia ties of Hillary’s campaign chief"},"content":{"rendered":"

Uncovering the Russia ties of Hillary’s campaign chief<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

Lawmakers failed to seize on an alarming development in the Russia collusion story last week, one that should spark serious and immediate congressional inquiry.<\/span><\/p>\n

But it didn\u2019t involve President Trump or his administration.<\/span><\/p>\n

During a heated Fox Business interview with Maria Bartiromo, Hillary Clinton\u2019s former campaign chief John Podesta made a series of misleading statements when questioned about his involvement in a company that received $35 million from the Russian government while Hillary served as secretary of state.<\/span><\/p>\n

On Jan. 18, 2011, a small green-energy company named Joule Unlimited announced Podesta\u2019s appointment to its board. Months later, Rusnano, a Kremlin-backed investment fund founded by Vladimir Putin, pumped $35 million into Joule. Serving alongside Podesta on Joule\u2019s board were senior Russian official Anatoly Chubais and oligarch Ruben Vardanyan, who has been appointed by Putin to a Russian economic-modernization council.<\/span><\/p>\n

Bartiromo asked Podesta why he failed to disclose his role in Joule as required by law when he entered the White House in January 2014 to serve as counselor to President Barack Obama.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cMaria, that\u2019s not true. I fully disclosed and was completely compliant,\u201d Podesta shot back.<\/span><\/p>\n

But according to his own financial-disclosure form, Podesta only listed two of the three entities that made up Joule Unlimited, failing to disclose his presence on the board of the Dutch-registered Stichting Joule Global Foundation.<\/span><\/p>\n

When Bartiromo pressed Podesta on the whereabouts of his 75,000 shares of Joule stock, Podesta resorted to Clintonesque semantics: \u201cI didn\u2019t have any stock in any Russian company!\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Notice the rhetorical sleight of tongue there: Joule is based in Massachusetts, not Russia, making Podesta\u2019s statement technically true. Podesta added: \u201cAnd by the way, I divested before I went into the White House.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Yet again, it\u2019s not that simple. WikiLeaks documents reveal that when he joined the Obama White House, Podesta transferred his Joule shares to an LLC controlled by his adult children. He also resumed communicating with Joule and Joule investors after leaving the White House and joining Hillary Clinton\u2019s campaign. In fact, he received an invoice from his lawyers in April 2015 \u2014 a consent request for Dmitry Akhanov of Rusnano USA to join Joule\u2019s board.<\/span><\/p>\n

But nothing to see here, Podesta insisted.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cI was on the board of an American company that did business here and only here,\u201d he said. \u201cThe Russian company had a small investment in that company. We can go round and around the tree.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Was Joule\u2019s business \u201chere and only here\u201d in America as Podesta claimed? Not according to Joule\u2019s own CEO and president, Bill Sims. While thanking Putin\u2019s Rusnano, Sims said the investment would help support \u201cthe development of our global presence\u201d and \u201ccomplements the company\u2019s expansion plans in Europe, the Middle East, and Mexico.\u201d Moreover, Stichting Joule is, itself, an overseas entity. Indeed, Rusnano\u2019s investment in Joule was in part to develop a manufacturing facility in Russia.<\/span><\/p>\n

And what about Podesta\u2019s contention that Putin\u2019s investment fund represented a \u201csmall investment\u201d in Joule? In 2012 the company claimed it had raised $110 million to date.<\/span><\/p>\n

That meant the Kremlin-backed $35 million investment given to Joule after Podesta\u2019s board appointment represented over 30 percent of Joule\u2019s outside financing.<\/span><\/p>\n

There\u2019s also this inconvenient fact: In 2016, Russia\u2019s largest bank, Sberbank, where Joule board member Reuben Vardanyan formerly served as head of its investment-banking division, had a $170,000 lobbying contract with the Podesta Group \u2014 which is owned by John Podesta\u2019s brother, Tony Podesta.<\/span><\/p>\n

In short, Clinton\u2019s top campaign chief and a senior counselor to Obama sat on Joule\u2019s board alongside top Russian officials as Putin\u2019s Kremlin-backed investment fund funneled $35 million into Joule. No one looking at the Podesta fact-pattern can claim to care about rooting out Russian collusion and not rigorously investigate the tangle of relationships.<\/span><\/p>\n

Are US officials investigating the matter? We don\u2019t know. When Bartiromo asked Podesta whether his closed-door session in front of the House Intelligence Committee included questions about his Russian ties and Joule, Podesta punted: \u201cI have already told you that I was asked not to talk about specific questions, and I said I would respect that.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

After the slippery answers Podesta delivered during his explosive Fox Business interview, US officials have more reasons than ever to demand answers about John Podesta, Joule Unlimited and Putin\u2019s Rusnano investment fund. If they weren\u2019t investigating Podesta before, they should be now.<\/span><\/p>\n

Source:-\u00a0http:\/\/nypost.com\/2017\/07\/05\/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief\/<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t