{"id":20199,"date":"2017-01-24T05:37:37","date_gmt":"2017-01-24T05:37:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/?p=20199"},"modified":"2017-01-24T05:37:37","modified_gmt":"2017-01-24T05:37:37","slug":"gop-senators-outline-first-obamacare-replacement-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/news\/gop-senators-outline-first-obamacare-replacement-plan.html","title":{"rendered":"GOP senators outline first Obamacare replacement plan"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

GOP senators outline first Obamacare replacement plan<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

GOP senators outline first Obamacare replacement plan:-<\/strong> The GOP\u2019s first Obamacare replacement proposal landed in the legislative hopper on Monday, as two Republican senators outlined their preferred alternative to the Affordable Care Act.<\/span><\/p>\n

The move comes amid conflicting signals from Republicans about when and how they will dismantle Obamacare and enact their own health care reform plan.<\/span><\/p>\n

It also comes after President Trump, in one of his first actions, signed an executive order allowing federal agencies to unravel the ACA, which some fear could create even more uncertainty in an already shaky health insurance marketplace. Trump\u2019s executive order was broad, and it\u2019s not clear yet how his administration will implement it.<\/span><\/p>\n

The proposal unveiled on Monday, sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, could provide a starting point for the Obamacare replacement debate. But the Cassidy-Collins bill also includes several controversial provisions \u2014 including at least temporarily keeping all the tax increases included in Obamacare to pay for their alternative \u2014 that could be nonstarters within their own party.<\/span><\/p>\n

In its draft form, the Cassidy-Collins bill would give states three options:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 Keep the Affordable Care Act, with individuals and small businesses able to purchase insurance on state exchanges and low-income residents eligible for federal subsidies to cover the cost of that coverage. States that expanded Medicaid, a state-federal health program for the poor, would be able to maintain that.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 Give states most of the federal funding promised under Obamacare, the 95 percent of the subsidies and all the Medicaid expansion money, to create tax-free Health Savings Accounts for low-income residents. Those individuals could then use the money in their HSAs to purchase insurance and pay for their health care.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2022 Reject any federal assistance, risking a spike in the uninsured rates and uncertainty in their insurance markets.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe power is best held by individuals and the states,\u201d said Cassidy, a physician.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cCalifornia and New York, you love Obamacare, you can keep it,\u201d the Louisiana Republican said, but states that want to try something different can choose among the other two options.<\/span><\/p>\n

But the Senate\u2019s top Democrat, Charles Schumer of New York, blasted the GOP plan as unworkable and an \u201cempty fa\u00e7ade\u201d that would create chaos in the marketplace.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cMillions of Americans would be kicked off their plans, out-of-pocket costs and deductibles for consumers would skyrocket, employer-based coverage for working families would be disrupted, and protections for people with pre-existing conditions, such as cancer, would be gutted,\u201d Schumer said. \u201cIt is nearly impossible to keep the benefits of the Affordable Care Act without keeping the whole thing.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, a left-leaning health advocacy group, noted that bill promotes HSAs, which he said are designed to go with high-deductible catastrophic insurance plans, rather than more traditional coverage. And he said the states that choose to enact that option would receive fewer federal dollars–95 percent of the federal subsidies–which would inevitably translate into higher costs and reduced coverage for low-income Americans.<\/span><\/p>\n

“This is a major step backwards,” Pollack said.<\/span><\/p>\n

Collins said it\u2019s vital to get the Obamacare replacement debate started as soon as possible. The ACA is not working, she said, and the GOP\u2019s talk about replacement, without providing specifics, is sowing further confusion for health care consumers and providers.<\/span><\/p>\n

Collins suggested that Trump did not help matters with his executive order.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe executive order is very confusing, and we really don\u2019t know yet what the impact would be,\u201d she said. \u201cWe need legislation.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Source:-\u00a0http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/news\/politics\/2017\/01\/23\/gop-senators-outline-first-obamacare-replacement-plan\/96951118\/<\/span><\/div>\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t