Have you grown bored of seeing your local Starbucks awash in silver, mid-sized laptops, all sporting that glowing Apple logo? We don\u2019t blame you. Apple has remained committed to the MacBook Pro\u2019s design over the last four years, counting on engineering excellence to persevere through multiple product cycles. That decision drove Mac fans wild, as many itched for a newer, faster Pro \u2013 and ended up with \u201cnew\u201d models that looked the same as what they already owned.<\/span><\/p>\n Now, the wait is finally over, and it\u2019s unfortunate that Mac fans have been left starving for an update \u2013 because the new MacBook Pro\u2019s price is hard to swallow.<\/span><\/p>\n The base 13-inch model without the Touch Bar is $1,500, a $200 upcharge over the old entry-level Pro. If you want the Touch Bar model we reviewed, you\u2019ll have to shell out $1,800, though you at least get a processor upgrade as part of the deal.<\/span><\/p>\n $1,800 is a lot for a MacBook Pro 13 with a Core i5 processor, even by Apple\u2019s standards. The sharp increase in price means you can only obtain a Core i5 MacBook Pro at prices that used to get you a Core i7, and perhaps a RAM upgrade as well. Can the new model live up to the expectations set by its price?<\/span> One look at the new MacBook Pro 13 with Touch Bar is all you need to know it\u2019s a Mac. That\u2019s even more impressive now that Apple has decided to take attention away from its branding, ditching the glowing white apple in favor of a slick, subtle gloss logo similar to what\u2019s on the MacBook, the iPhone, and the iPad.<\/span><\/p>\n As before, the MacBook Pro 13 features an all-unibody design lacking any visible seams aside from those on the bottom. But the new version is slimmer and trimmer, shaving weight down to 3.02 pounds from 3.48 pounds, while thickness drops from 0.71 inches to 0.59 inches.<\/span><\/p>\n And that\u2019s not all. Apple, like Dell, has aggressively shaved space from the display bezels to reduce the overall footprint. The new MacBook Pro 13 remains slightly larger than the Dell XPS 13 overall, and a couple tenths of a pound heavier. Users with the older Pro model will appreciate the improvement.<\/span><\/p>\n Oh, and the new model comes in Space Gray, which hopefully is the beginning of a wider color selection. The 12-inch MacBook comes in Silver, Space Gray, Rose Gold, and Gold. Color choices may seem petty, but they add a touch of personality.<\/span><\/p>\n There\u2019s no arguing with the new MacBook Pro\u2019s elegance. The beauty of Apple design has always been subtle, which is why the company is sometimes accused of being safe, or boring. The new Pro doesn\u2019t even try to side-step those criticisms. It\u2019s not the smallest 13-inch laptop, or the lightest, and its materials feel much as before. There\u2019s something to be said for design that works, though, even if it\u2019s not innovative, and the new MacBook Pro remains the most luxurious laptop around.<\/span> While the MacBook Pro 13 with Touch Bar has a headphone jack, it makes another connectivity choice that\u2019s just as controversial and, functionally, more important. Apple has decided that USB Type-C \/ Thunderbolt 3 is the future, and has ditched every other port.<\/span><\/p>\n Yes, USB Type-C is all you get. The MacBook Pro 13 with Touch Bar has four of these ports, two on each side. Even the card reader is missing. Crazy as it sounds, the decision has it benefits. The simplicity of the port selection is hard to argue with, and every port is a charging port, so you can plug the wall adapter into whichever is more convenient. The ports are quick, too, so you can hook up multiple displays or use fast external SSDs without worry about connectivity bandwidth.<\/span><\/p>\n Now, for the bad news \u2013 you\u2019re going to need adapters, and you might need lots of them. Do you use an external display? That\u2019s an adapter. External hard drive? Adapter. Wired input of any sort? Adapter. Ethernet? Adapter. SDcard? Adapter. At best, you\u2019ll need to purchase one or two dongles. At worst, you\u2019re going to need a dock solution, which can add another $100 to $200 to the price.<\/span><\/p>\n The greatest irony? Even Apple\u2019s iPhone can\u2019t plug into any MacBook Pro 13 without purchasing an adapter.<\/span><\/p>\n At least it can communicate wirelessly. Speaking of which, the new Pro 13 has the usual 802.11ac Wi-Fi adapter paired with Bluetooth 4.2. It\u2019s good to see the latest version of Bluetooth here, as it\u2019ll help connect with a wireless keyboard and mouse.<\/span> The 12-inch MacBook, released last year, debuted an all-new \u201cbutterfly\u201d switch that\u2019s much thinner than any used in a laptop keyboard prior. Though Apple touted it as having great feel, we complained that \u201ctyping for more than an hour [left our] fingers with a dull ache,\u201d due to the keyboard\u2019s stiff feel and limited travel.<\/span><\/p>\n Now that same keyboard can be found on the MacBook Pro. Well, not exactly the same. The Pro\u2019s keyboard has a \u201csecond-generation butterfly mechanism,\u201d with slightly more travel than the first. And it is an improvement. If you\u2019re a writer, the MacBook Pro 13 will serve you better than the MacBook Pro 12.<\/span><\/p>\n That\u2019s not to say it\u2019ll serve you well. While travel has improved, the keyboard continues to suffer a stiff, abrupt bottoming action that can make long typing sessions tiresome. The degree to which this will bother you is a matter of preference. A few Digital Trends writers thought it was perfectly acceptable, and most thought they could learn to live with it. No one said they preferred it over the previous MacBook Pro 13.<\/span><\/p>\n And it\u2019s not clear why this sacrifice was made. While the new MacBook Pro 13 is thin, it\u2019s as thick or thicker than many competitors with better keyboards, such as the Acer Swift 7, HP Spectre, HP Spectre x360, and Dell XPS 13. Whatever the reason, it\u2019s clear Apple had to make a compromise between size, performance, and keyboard quality, with the latter getting the bad end of the bargain.<\/span><\/p>\n Below the keyboard is a revised, plus-sized touchpad. Unlike the keyboard, this is an unmitigated plus. The spacious surface improves the ease of using multi-touch gestures, which work consistently well. While the new, larger surface means constant contact between it and your palms, we didn\u2019t notice a single instance of unintended input throughout our testing.<\/span><\/p>\n And don\u2019t forget Force Touch. The haptic feedback system, which uses vibration to simulate a click, is so good at emulating real movement that most users never notice a difference. It also offers force sensitivity, which can enable special interface functions \u2013 just like the iPhone. The feature isn\u2019t widely embraced, even by Apple\u2019s own software, but it\u2019s great when offered.<\/span> In May of 2014, Apple Insider published an article talking about upcoming Macs with \u201cin-key displays,\u201d a rumor that began to snowball in early 2016. After several misses (the rumormills thought it might appear in early 2016, then in summer), it\u2019s finally here in all its OLED glory.<\/span><\/p>\n If nothing else, the Touch Bar is great to look at it. It boasts Retina-equivalent pixel density, which means icons are rendered with crisp, vibrant graphics. And because it\u2019s OLED, blacks look inky black \u2013 so dark it\u2019s often hard to find the Touch Bar\u2019s boundaries.<\/span><\/p>\n As a conversation starter, then, it holds up. As a functional tool? Less so. Apple tries to integrate the Touch Bar in a way that makes it relevant even in everyday web browser, note-taking, and photo-viewing. Its display changes constantly as new apps are opened, and old ones closed. It performs well, keeping up no matter how quickly apps are switched, or how many are open.<\/span><\/p>\n Yet there\u2019s rarely much use for it. At best, it provides a quick way to scroll through lists, such as your Photo Stream. It can also be useful if you\u2019d like to scroll through a video \u2013 and it\u2019s great at picking up on such content, activating a scroll bar even when browsing YouTube.<\/span><\/p>\n In other cases, though, it\u2019s clearly a solution searching for a problem. Take typing, for instant. As you input text in Safari, Word, and other apps, the Touch Bar constantly flashes word suggestions. It\u2019s a feature that works well on the iPhone, where typing is often slow and cumbersome.<\/span><\/p>\n More: Macbook Pro 13-inch with Retina review<\/span><\/p>\n On a laptop, though, it\u2019s pointless. Type in \u201coffice,\u201d for instance, and the Touch Bar will suggest alternatives. Did you mean \u201cofficers\u201d? Or, perhaps \u201coff-season\u201d? This happens whether a word is spelled properly or not. Even if you do slip in a typo, it\u2019s hard to imagine why a user would look to the Touch Bar for help when MacOS already presents a correction on-screen and, in most cases, will correct the spelling automatically.<\/span><\/p>\n Even where it might be useful, the Touch Bar is limited by its size. It automatically displays open Safari tabs, complete with miniature content previews, a feature that could prove helpful. Yet the previews are so small that it\u2019s often hard to tell the tabs apart, even with just three or four open. If you open six, or eight, or ten tabs, then the previews become smaller still, until they\u2019re so tiny that it\u2019s hard to even tap the right one. Similar problems trouble its photo preview and video preview capabilities. In theory, you can scroll through photo collections. In practice, it\u2019s harder to do than with the touchpad.<\/span><\/p>\n In short, the Touch Bar isn\u2019t great. But giving the function row over to an OLED display does come with an important perk called Touch ID. Yes, you can now log in with your fingerprint, and it works as seamlessly as it does on iPhone. Fast, secure login authentication methods are a great way to improve security for the average user. And Touch ID integrates with Apple Pay, so you can use it to securely make online purchases \u2013 from stores that accept Apple Pay.<\/span> A quick look at the specifications could make you think Apple\u2019s new MacBook Pro 13 had an old display. It\u2019s still Retina, which means the resolution is still 2,560 \u00d7 1,600. That was stunning in 2012, but today it seems mediocre next to QHD+ (3,200 \u00d7 1,800) and 4K screens.<\/span><\/p>\n But don\u2019t worry, Mac faithful. You can banish any concerns about the display from your mind. It\u2019s fantastic.<\/span><\/p>\n We measured a maximum brightness of 548 lux. That\u2019s ridiculously brilliant, and complete overkill for use indoors, but it can help make the screen, which is still very glossy, usable in extreme situations. By comparison, the Dell XPS 13 with QHD+ display only hits 278 lux, and the HP Spectre x360 hits 355 lux. Both those systems can have a problem with glare in bright conditions, though Dell gives you the choice to combat that with a matte display option.<\/span><\/p>\n Brightness is only important in a bright room. What\u2019ll stun you, no matter where you use the MacBook Pro 13, is its color. The display can achieve 100 percent of the sRGB gamut, as well as 91 percent of AdobeRGB. It also delivered an average color error value of .72 (lower is better). Anything below one is generally unnoticeable to the human eye, and this reading is the lowest we\u2019ve ever recorded from a laptop. The previous record holder, Dell\u2019s XPS 15, boasted an average error value of .78.<\/span><\/p>\n Even the contrast ratio of 1,200:1 is excellent. The Pro can deliver dark blacks next to brilliant colors without trouble.<\/span><\/p>\n The only flaw we found is gamma, which came in at a reading of 2.3. The ideal curve is 2.2, and the MacBook Pro 13\u2019s result indicates it portrays content a bit darker than it should. But this is a very minor fluctuation, and plenty of competitors miss it, too.<\/span><\/p>\n When the numbers are tallied, the new Retina display comes away a winner. It defeats the Dell XPS 13, Acer Swift 7, Asus Zenbook 3, HP Spectre x360, and Lenovo Yoga 910, beating all of them in color gamut, color accuracy, and contrast ratio.<\/span><\/p>\n That\u2019s not to say it lacks competition, though. Microsoft\u2019s Surface Book can go toe-to-toe with it. Though our tests found the Surface Book had a narrower contrast ratio of 1010:1, its gamma curve reading was the proper 2.2.<\/span><\/p>\n There\u2019s also a small handful of Windows systems, like the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga, available with OLED displays. These clobber the MacBook Pro 13\u2019s strong contrast ratio, and deliver an even wider color gamut, all with accurate gamma. But they don\u2019t match the Mac\u2019s out-of-the-box color accuracy.<\/span><\/p>\n Numbers aside, the display on the MacBook Pro 13 is excellent, and looks it in everyday use. Games and movies are crisp and vibrant, and high-quality photos render with such detail that you might think your display was switched with a canvas print. The Retina display may not be this Pro\u2019s headline feature, but it remains its most attractive trait.<\/span> Apple has always shown an affinity for audio quality rarely found elsewhere, and the MacBook Pro is no exception. In fact, its speakers are the best we can recall hearing in a 13-inch system. That\u2019s saying a lot, because a few recent laptops in this category, like the Asus\u2019 Zenbook 3, have surprised us with their quality.<\/span><\/p>\n Source:\u00a0http:\/\/www.digitaltrends.com\/laptop-reviews\/apple-macbook-pro-13-inch-touch-bar-review\/<\/span><\/p>\n
\nStill the most luxurious laptop<\/span><\/p>\n
\nAny port you want, as long as it\u2019s USB Type-C<\/span><\/p>\n
\nThe keyboard of the future isn\u2019t very good<\/span><\/p>\n
\nThe Touch Bar searches for purpose<\/span><\/p>\n
\nDisplay<\/span><\/p>\n
\nPump up the bass<\/span><\/p>\n