{"id":13360,"date":"2016-10-10T05:56:04","date_gmt":"2016-10-10T05:56:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/?p=13360"},"modified":"2016-10-10T05:56:04","modified_gmt":"2016-10-10T05:56:04","slug":"fact-checking-the-second-clinton-trump-presidential-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.biphoo.com\/bipnews\/news\/fact-checking-the-second-clinton-trump-presidential-debate.html","title":{"rendered":"Fact-checking the second Clinton-Trump presidential debate"},"content":{"rendered":"

Fact-checking the second Clinton-Trump presidential debate<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/h2>\n

Fact-checking the second Clinton-Trump presidential debate:-<\/strong> In the second presidential debate, Donald Trump once again relied on many dubious and false claims that have been repeatedly been debunked. His Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, on occasion made a factual misstep, but it didn\u2019t even compare to Trump\u2019s long list of exaggerations.<\/span><\/p>\n

Here\u2019s a round-up of 25 interesting and suspect claims. As is our practice, we do not award Pinocchios when we do a roundup of facts in debates.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cOne of the women, who is a wonderful woman, at 12 years old, was raped at 12. Her client she represented got him off, and she\u2019s seen laughing on two separate occasions, laughing at the girl who was raped.\u201d<\/span>
\n\u2014 Donald Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump mixes up a story about a long-ago criminal case. Clinton did not laugh at a rape victim.<\/span><\/p>\n

In 1975, Clinton \u2014 then Hillary Rodham \u2014 was a 27-year-old law professor running a legal aid clinic in the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville. After a 41-year-old factory worker was accused of raping a 12-year-old girl, he asked the judge to replace his male court-appointed attorney with a female one. The judge went through the list of a half-dozen women practicing law in the county and picked Clinton.<\/span><\/p>\n

In her autobiography, \u201cLiving History,\u201d Clinton wrote, \u201cI told [prosecutor] Mahlon [Gibson] I really don\u2019t feel comfortable taking on such a client, but Mahlon gently reminded me that I couldn\u2019t very well refuse the judge\u2019s request.\u201d Gibson has confirmed that account in interviews with Newsday and CNN, saying Clinton told him: \u201cI don\u2019t want to represent this guy. I just can\u2019t stand this. I don\u2019t want to get involved. Can you get me off?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Ultimately, the prosecution\u2019s case fell apart for a number of reasons, including investigators mishandling evidence of bloody underwear, so in a plea agreement the charges were reduced from first-degree rape to unlawful fondling of a minor under the age of 14. Not until 2008 did the victim, Kathy Shelton, realize that Clinton had been the lawyer on the other side. She has since attacked Clinton for putting \u201cme through hell\u201d and she appeared at a news event with Trump before the debate.<\/span><\/p>\n

The rape case re-emerged when Washington Free Beacon in 2014 discovered unpublished audio recordings from the mid-1980s of Clinton being interviewed by Arkansas reporter Roy Reed for an article that was never published.<\/span><\/p>\n

In the recorded interview, Clinton is heard laughing or giggling four times when discussing the case with unusual candor; the reporter is also heard laughing, and sometimes Clinton is responding to him.<\/span><\/p>\n

Here are the four instances:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cOf course he [the defendant] claimed he didn\u2019t [rape]. All this stuff. He took a lie detector test. I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.\u201d (Both Clinton and the reporter laugh.)<\/span>
\n\u201cSo I got an order to see the evidence and the prosecutor didn\u2019t want me to see the evidence. I had to go to Maupin Cummings [the judge] and convince Maupin that yes indeed I had a right to see the evidence before it was presented. (Clinton laughs lightly between \u201cevidence\u201d and \u201cbefore.\u201d)<\/span>
\n\u201cI handed it [a biography of her expert witness] to Mahlon Gibson, and I said, \u2018Well this guy\u2019s ready to come up from New York to prevent this miscarriage of justice.\u2019\u201d (Clinton laughs, as does the reporter.)<\/span>
\n\u201cSo [Judge] Maupin had to, you know, under law he was supposed to determine whether the plea was factually supported. Maupin asked me to leave the room while he examined my client so that he could find out if it was factually supported. I said \u2018Judge I can\u2019t leave the room I\u2019m his lawyer!\u2019 he said \u2018I know but I don\u2019t want to talk about this in front of you.\u2019\u201d (Reporter says, \u201cOh God, really?\u201d And they both laugh.)<\/span><\/p>\n

Bill Clinton \u201chad to pay an $850,000 fine to one of the women. Paula Jones, who\u2019s also here tonight.\u201d<\/span>
\n\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

Paula Jones, a former Arkansas state employee, alleged that in 1991 Clinton, while governor, propositioned her and exposed himself. She later filed a sexual harassment suit. The case was dismissed by a federal judge, who ruled that even if her allegations were true, such \u201cboorish and offensive\u201d behavior would not be severe enough to constitute sexual harassment under the law. That ruling was under appeal when Clinton in 1998 settled the suit for $850,000, with no apology or admission of guilt. All but $200,000 was directed to pay legal fees.<\/span><\/p>\n

Your [Obamacare] health insurance is going up \u2026 68 percent, 59 percent, 71 percent.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

Premiums are expected to increase overall in 2017, but Trump is cherry-picking from the highest proposed increases in the insurance marketplace.<\/span><\/p>\n

State-by-state weighted average increases range from just 1.3 percent in Rhode Island to as high as 71 percent in Oklahoma. But the most common plans in the marketplace will see an average increase of 9 percent, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation\u2019s July analysis. These plans have been used as the benchmark to calculate government subsidies.<\/span><\/p>\n

The vast majority of marketplace enrollees (about eight in 10) receive government premium subsidies. They are protected from a premium increase (and may even see a decrease) if they stay with a low-cost plan. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, \u201canecdotal examples of premium hikes or averages across insurers can provide a skewed picture of the increases marketplace enrollees will actually face.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cYou owe the president an apology, because as you know very well, your campaign, Sidney Blumenthal \u2014 he\u2019s another real winner that you have \u2014 and he\u2019s the one that got this started, along with your campaign manager, and they were on television just two weeks ago, she was, saying exactly that. So you really owe him an apology.\u201d<\/span>
\n\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

To support the debunked notion that Clinton\u2019s campaign originated \u201cbirther\u201d rumors during the 2008 presidential campaign, Trump once again referenced longtime Clinton ally Sidney Blumenthal and Clinton campaign manager Patti Solis Doyle. But he\u2019s grasping at straws\u2013and once again refused to apologize for his own role in promoting the birther fable.<\/span><\/p>\n

James Asher, former D.C. bureau chief of McClatchy, has said that Blumenthal \u201cstrongly urged\u201d him to \u201cinvestigate the exact place of President Obama\u2019s birth, which he suggested was in Kenya.\u201d McClatchy assigned a reporter to go to Kenya, and the reporter found the allegation was false, Asher said. (We reached out to Asher several times but did not receive a response.)<\/span><\/p>\n

Blumenthal, declining to elaborate further, said in a statement to The Fact Checker: \u201cThis is false. Period. Donald Trump cannot distract from the fact that he is the one who embraced and promoted the birther lie, and bears the responsibility for it.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Solis Doyle said in a recent CNN interview that in December 2007, a volunteer coordinator in Iowa forwarded an email perpetuating the birther conspiracy. Clinton \u201cmade the decision immediately to let that person go,\u201d Solis Doyle said in the interview.<\/span><\/p>\n

As in the instance with the Iowa volunteer coordinator, the campaign denounced isolated instances of Clinton\u2019s staffers questioning whether Obama was Muslim. We found that there\u2019s no evidence that she or her campaign were \u201cpressing it very hard\u201d \u2014 though some of her supporters did perpetuate the claims in the bitter 2008 primary campaign against Obama.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cHillary Clinton attacked those same women, attacked them viciously.\u201d<\/span>
\n\u2014 Donald Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump has used this line of attack throughout the campaign, sometimes saying Hillary Clinton was an \u201cenabler\u201d of her husband\u2019s affairs, saying she would \u201cgo after these women and destroy their lives.\u201dn><\/span><\/p>\n

One of the interviews that Clinton\u2019s critics have pointed to is a Jan. 27, 1998 interview on The Today Show, saying it showed Clinton was discrediting allegations by then-White House intern Monica Lewinsky. This interview took place a week after her husband was accused of having an affair with Lewinsky, and Clinton blamed Republican foes for making false attacks against her husband.<\/span><\/p>\n

Specifically, critics have pointed to this quote by Clinton:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cI mean, look at the very people who are involved in this, they have popped up in other settings,\u201d Clinton told Matt Lauer. \u201cThis is the great story here, for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it, is this vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

This interview, by many accounts, was certainly pivotal to saving Bill Clinton\u2019s presidency, as his wife forcefully backed him. But by Hillary Clinton\u2019s account at the time her husband had not yet admitted the Lewinsky affair to her. That did not happen until Aug. 15, 1998, according to her memoir.<\/span><\/p>\n

\nMoreover, at the time of the interview, Lewinsky also denied there had been a relationship. Her lawyer had submitted an affidavit on Jan. 12 from her saying she \u201cnever had a sexual relationship with the president.\u201d Lewinsky did not begin to testify before the independent prosecutor about the full extent of the relationship until July 27, six months after the Today Show interview. Lewinsky testified for 15 days, after which the president finally confessed to his wife.<\/span><\/p>\n

See our in-depth fact-checks on this here and here.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cBill Clinton was abusive to those women.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

While Trump has ramped up the attacks on the Clintons and the sex allegations against Bill Clinton, the record shows that Trump dismissed or minimized these very allegations for many years. Trump dismissed the women involved as losers and not attractive. Trump even suggested that Americans would have been more forgiving if Clinton had slept with more beautiful women.<\/span><\/p>\n

Here are some examples (see more here):<\/span><\/p>\n

In 1998, Trump attacked Paula Jones, who had sued Clinton, alleging sexual harassment: \u201cPaula Jones is a loser, but the fact is that she may be responsible for bringing down a president indirectly.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

In 1999, Trump faulted Bill Clinton for the way he handled the Lewinsky scandal, and complained about his choice in women: \u201cHe handled the Monica situation disgracefully. It\u2019s sad because he would go down as a great President if he had not had this scandal. People would have been more forgiving if he\u2019d had an affair with a really beautiful woman of sophistication. Kennedy and Marilyn Monroe were on a different level. Now Clinton can\u2019t get into golf clubs in Westchester. A former President begging to get in a golf club. It\u2019s unthinkable.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

During a 2001 interview, Trump again expressed sympathy for Bill Clinton, arguing that the former president\u2019s biggest mistake was answering questions about his sex life. Trump said he likes Clinton, and finds it all too easy to understand why the then president found it hard to answer the question: \u201cDid you f\u2026 Monica?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWhat he should have done is fought for years not to answer it,\u201d Trump said in the interview. \u201cI mean, isn\u2019t it amazing and terrible that a guy \u2014 a president \u2014 is put in that position? He could have gone down as truly great and, instead, you know, he\u2019ll be viewed somewhat differently, which is really a shame.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWhen I look at the Iran deal and how bad a deal it is for us, it\u2019s a one-sided transaction where we\u2019re giving back $150 billion to a terrorist state, really, the number one terror state.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump always makes it sound like this is U.S. taxpayer money \u2014 and he always uses a too-high estimate. Because of international sanctions over its nuclear program, Iran had billions of dollars in assets that were frozen in foreign banks around the globe. With sanctions lifted, in theory those funds would be unlocked.<\/span><\/p>\n

But the Treasury Department has estimated that once Iran fulfills other obligations, it would have about $55 billion left. (Much of the other money was obligated to illiquid projects in China.) For its part, the Central Bank of Iran said the number was actually $32 billion, not $55 billion.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIn San Bernardino, many people saw the bombs all over the apartment.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

There is no evidence this was the case in the 2015 terrorist attack that killed 14 people. There have been unconfirmed second- or third-hand reports \u2014 a friend of a friend of a neighbor \u2014 that a neighbor claimed to have noticed suspicious activity but did not report anything for fear of doing racial profiling. The religion of this supposed neighbor is unknown, but presumably a fear of racial profiling would suggest the neighbor was not Muslim.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cYou [Clinton] get a subpoena, and after getting the subpoena, you delete 33,000 e-mails, and then you acid wash them or bleach them, as you would say, very expensive process.\u201d<\/span>
\n\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump is technically correct on the timeline, but Clinton\u2019s staff had requested the emails to be deleted months before the subpoena, according to the FBI\u2019s August 2016 report. Moreover, there\u2019s no evidence Clinton deleted the emails in anticipation of the subpoena, and FBI director James Comey has said his agency\u2019s investigation found no evidence any work-related emails were \u201cintentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

PolitiFact compiled a helpful timeline of events relating to Clinton\u2019s release of her emails, based on the FBI report. From their timeline:<\/span><\/p>\n

On July 23, 2014, the State Department agreed to produce records pertaining to the 2012 attack in Libya, for the House Select Committee on Benghazi\u2019s investigation. In December 2014, Clinton aide Cheryl Mills told an employee of the company that managed her server to delete emails on her server unrelated to government work that were older than 60 days.<\/span><\/p>\n

On March 4, 2015, the Benghazi Committee issued a subpoena requiring Clinton to turn over her emails relating to Libya. Three weeks later, between March 25 and March 31, the employee had an \u201coh s\u2014\u201d moment and realized he did not delete the emails that Mills requested in December 2014, he told the FBI. The employee then deleted the emails and used a program called BleachBit to delete the files.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cI was against the war in Iraq. Has not been debunked.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

This is just totally false.<\/span><\/p>\n

We have found no evidence of his early opposition. Trump expressed lukewarm support the first time he was asked about it on Sept. 11, 2002, and was not clearly against it until he was quoted in the August 2004 Esquire cover story titled \u201cDonald Trump: How I\u2019d Run the Country (Better).\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

But by the middle of 2004, many Americans had turned against the war, making Trump\u2019s position not particularly unique. In light of Trump\u2019s repeated false claim, Esquire has added an editor\u2019s note to its August 2004 story, saying, \u201cThe Iraq War began in March 2003, more than a year before this story ran, thus nullifying Trump\u2019s timeline.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

We have awarded this claim Four Pinocchios, compiled a timeline of all of Trump\u2019s comments prior to the invasion in March 2003, and even a video documenting how this is a bogus claim.<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump is simply wrong when he says the United States is the highest taxed nation in the world.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Pew Research Center, using 2014 data, found that the tax bill for Americans, under various scenarios, is below average for developed countries.<\/span><\/p>\n

In 2014, according to comparative tables of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), revenue as a percentage of the gross domestic product \u2014 the broadest measure of the economy \u2014 was 26 percent for the United States.<\/span><\/p>\n

Out of 34 countries, that put the United States in the bottom third \u2014 and well below the OECD average of 34.4 percent.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201c[I] negotiated a treaty with Russia to lower nuclear weapons.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014 Clinton<\/span><\/p>\n

Clinton overstated the impact of the 2011 New START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty) agreement, which she helped negotiate as Secretary of State.<\/span><\/p>\n

New START placed tighter limits on deployed strategic weapons but Russia was actually already meeting the treaty\u2019s limits, for the most part, when the treaty\u2019s implementation began. Indeed, Russia has increased deployed nuclear weapons from 1,537 in February 2011 to 1,796 in September of this year. Also, the treaty does not restrict either country from stockpiling weapons, nor does it require them to destroy any existing weapons.<\/span><\/p>\n

Russia\u2019s total nuclear warhead arsenal has been on a steady decline, from 40,000, since 1986. During Obama\u2019s presidency, Russia\u2019s nuclear warhead total has hovered around 4,500 since 2012.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAs soon as my routine audit is finished, I\u2019ll release my taxes.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump cites an Internal Revenue Service audit as his justification for not releasing his federal income tax returns, but the audit does not prohibit from releasing the returns. Richard Nixon, who started the tradition of presidents and presidential candidates releasing their returns, did so in the middle of an audit.<\/span><\/p>\n

Moreover, Trump has not released his tax returns from before 2009, which are no longer under audit, according to his attorney.<\/span><\/p>\n

Presidential candidates have no legal obligation to release their returns, but there has long been a tradition to do so for the sake of transparency. Hillary Clinton has released three decades\u2019 worth of tax returns.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cGaddafi\u2019s out, it\u2019s a mess. And by the way ISIS has a good chunk of their oil.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s is simply wrong.<\/span><\/p>\n

The toppling of Libyan dictator Moammar Gaddafi \u2014 at the hands of Libyan rebels aided by U.S. and NATO air power \u2014 has led to highly unstable governance as the country\u2019s tribes have vied for influence and power. There are rival governments based in the capital of Tripoli and the eastern city of Tobruk, and neither has fully recognized the \u201cunity\u201d government established by United Nations mediators.<\/span><\/p>\n

The National Oil Corporation (NOC) claims to be operating independently without taking orders from either of the country\u2019s rival governments, though a rival NOC appears to have been set up in the east.<\/span>
\nISIS has attempted to step into the power vacuum. But not a single expert or news article that we consulted said that ISIS has grabbed a single oil field. Instead, militants appear to be trying to disrupt the flow of oil, mainly by scaring workers away.<\/span><\/p>\n

Claudia Gazzini, a Tripoli-based senior analyst at the International Crisis Group, told The Fact Checker it was not true that the Islamic State has control of any Libyan oil.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWhile it is true that ISIS has attacked oil fields in the Sirte basin area and destroyed key equipment there, they have not sought to keep control of the oil fields,\u201d Gazzini said. \u201cAt the moment they appear to have adopted a hit-and-run strategy. There is no evidence that they are pumping out the crude oil and certainly no evidence that they are trading it. At the moment they just appear interested in starving the Libyan state of oil revenues.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAmbassador Stevens sent 600 requests for help.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump made a ludicrous claim that U.S. ambassador Chris Stevens made 600 requests for help before he perished in the attack on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi. This is a misunderstanding of a figure widely used by Republicans on the House Select Committee on Benghazi but even they never claimed that these came from Stevens.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Fact Checker delved deeply into this \u201c600\u201d figure. It is a subjective accounting of \u201crequests and concerns,\u201d not actual requests for help. There is no dispute that security was inadequate in Benghazi and that the State Department failed to respond to all requests for security. But the shorthand description of \u201c600 requests\u201d has left a misleading impression \u2014 so much so that many reporters and lawmakers appear to believe that all of these requests were ignored. At least some of the requests were actually fulfilled \u2014 and the counting of \u201cconcerns\u201d may be subject to dispute.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWe have an increase in murder within our cities, the biggest in 45 years.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

Homicides were up 10.8 percent nationwide in 2015, the biggest percentage jump in a single year since 1971, according to FBI data. But violent crime overall have been declining for about two decades, and are far below rates seen one or two decades ago.<\/span><\/p>\n

Homicides have continued to spike in major cities this year, though the rates remain far below their peak in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Law enforcement officials, including the FBI, have voiced concerns about the uptick in crime in 2015.<\/span><\/p>\n

Criminal justice experts warn against comparing crime trends from short periods of time, such as year over year. An annual trend can show a trajectory of where the trend might be headed, but still does not give a full picture. Many criminal justice experts say crime trends are determined over at least five years, preferably 10 or 20 years, of data.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cHillary Clinton wants to put all the miners out of business.\u201d<\/span>
\n\u2014 Trump<\/span><\/p>\n

Trump takes Clinton\u2019s statement out of context. During a March 2016 town hall, Clinton was asked by a voter: \u201cMake the case to poor whites who live in Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, who vote Republican, why they should vote for you based upon economic policies versus voting for a Republican?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Clinton gave a lengthy response, which included the line, \u201cWe\u2019re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business.\u201d It was part of her longer answer about how transitioning away from coal-powered plants has already affected mining communities, and her plan to help coal mine workers adjust after losing factory jobs, as explained in her November 2015 policy proposal for revitalizing coal communities.<\/span><\/p>\n

Here\u2019s her full answer. The portion that Trump cited is in bold.<\/span><\/p>\n

Well, first of all, I was happy to carry those states you mentioned, and I carried the white vote in those states, too, that voted Democratic now, I don\u2019t want to get carried away here.<\/span>
\nLook, we have serious economic problems in many parts of our country. And Roland is absolutely right. Instead of dividing people the way Donald Trump does, let\u2019s reunite around policies that will bring jobs and opportunities to all these underserved poor communities.<\/span><\/p>\n

So for example, I\u2019m the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country. Because we\u2019re going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business, right, Tim? And we\u2019re going to make it clear that we don\u2019t want to forget those people. Those people labored in those mines for generations, losing their health, often losing their lives to turn on our lights and power our factories.<\/span><\/p>\n

Now we\u2019ve got to move away from coal and all the other fossil fuels, but I don\u2019t want to move away from the people who did the best they could to produce the energy that we relied on.<\/span><\/p>\n

So whether it\u2019s coal country or Indian country or poor urban areas, there is a lot of poverty in America. We have gone backwards. We were moving in the right direction. In the \u201990s more people were lifted out of poverty than anytime in recent history. Because of the terrible economic policies of the Bush administration, President Obama was left with the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, and people fell back into poverty because they lost jobs, they lost homes, they lost opportunities, and hope.<\/span><\/p>\n

So I am passionate about this, which is why I have put forward specific plans about how we incentivize more jobs, more investment in poor communities, and put people to work.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThere wasn\u2019t \u2018check out a sex tape\u2019. It was just take a look at the person that she built up to be this wonderful Girl Scout who was no Girl Scout.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Source:-https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/fact-checker\/wp\/2016\/10\/10\/fact-checking-the-second-clinton-trump-presidential-debate\/<\/span><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t <\/div><\/div>\n\t\t